The loss numbers

What does '74–89% lose money' mean for a $500 account?

The headline is a population. Your account is a sample of one. Here is the honest translation between them.

Facts checked on October 22, 2026

The European regulator's range — 74 to 89 of every 100 retail CFD accounts lose money — is quoted everywhere and understood almost nowhere. For a beginner with $500, three translations matter: what the average loss figure means at your size, why your personal risk is governed more by costs than by the headline, and what the figure quietly assumes about the accounts inside it.

The average loss is not your loss

ESMA's average loss per client runs €1,600–€29,000 — larger than your whole account, because the measured population includes accounts far larger than yours. Your maximum loss on a $500 account with a regulated, negative-balance-protected firm is $500. The statistic does not predict your amount; it predicts your company: the large majority of the people who started accounts like yours, at firms like the one in the ad, finished down. What varies with size is the bill, not the base rate.

At $500, costs are the sharper number

Suppose you trade forex at $500 — a learning size on this site (computed minimum $1,000). Your cost stack at beginner frequency is about $20 a month: 4% of your account, every month, win or lose. Over a year that is roughly $240 of toll on a $500 account before your strategy's results. The headline figure tells you most accounts lose; the cost stack tells you the mechanism by which a small account loses even when its trader is 'about break-even' — and unlike the base rate, the cost stack is computable in advance, to the dollar, for your exact size. It is printed in every verdict our checker gives.

What the figure assumes — and the one lever you hold

The ESMA population traded leveraged products, many at sizes below their market's viable minimum, most without anything like a tested record. You cannot change the base rate, but you can refuse two of its ingredients: undercapitalisation (gate 2 of our checker) and the absent record (gate 3). The minority who profit in the studies share boring traits — adequate capital, measured costs, written rules. None of those traits is a secret indicator. All of them are available before the first deposit, which is the entire premise of this site.

Before you move

Run the checker with your numbers

Before you start, take the whole path

The verdict gives you the arithmetic for your market and your capital. The Start-or-Wait Kit gives you the complete workbook: the demo-record audit (the 50-trade review grid), the staged capital plan up to your market's minimum viable capital, the 90-day learning plan week by week, and the real-cost tracker — the spreadsheet experienced traders build by hand, ready to fill in.

Included in the $39 Start-or-Wait Kit

See the Start-or-Wait Kit

Sources: FINRA Regulatory Notice 26-10 (April 20, 2026) and the brokers' own pages for the PDT tracker; ESMA Decision (EU) 2018/796 and the AMF restatement for European CFD loss figures; ASIC Report 828 (FY2023–24) for Australia; CFTC retail forex materials for the United States; Barber, Lee, Liu & Odean (Taiwan market data) and Chague & De Losso (Brazil) for day-trading outcomes; the FPFX Technology dataset of 300,000+ prop-firm accounts, reported by Finance Magnates (2024); broker-published minimum deposits and margin schedules as dated on the dataset page. If a figure has moved since our check date, the issuer's own publication wins — and write to help@doogex.com so we can correct ours.